Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Daniel Lombraña pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
A long time ago, I wrote about Lens vs Farcaster https://paragraph.xyz/@teleyinex.eth/farcaster-vs-lens-protocol. The time has come to write about the Farcaster vs AT protocol https://paragraph.xyz/@teleyinex.eth/farcaster-vs-at-protocol The blog post analyzes how both protocols are built from the technical point of view. I hope you like it.
2 replies
1 recast
12 reactions

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Would enjoy a deeper dive! Some corrections: I believe Bluesky also uses CRDTs as part of its Automerge protocol, and CIDs are also data hashes just like Farcaster. They have more in common than the article implies. :)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Daniel Lombraña pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
I couldn't find more info on their docs. Maybe they have it in a different place. Thanks for the corrections.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Let me know if you want links for anything specific! CIDs are a construct of IPFS.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Daniel Lombraña pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
Can to share links for the auto merge protocol?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Lombraña pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Actually I think I mixed up the automerge thing with another protocol, my bad!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction