Daniel Lombraña  pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
How do we know that two physical objects are exactly the same? We can establish a way of measuring both objects based on something: molecules, wavelengths, distances, composition, design, etc. Each of these metrics gives us a quality check. We can go from fine to coarse-grained measurements. Fine-grained ones will provide us more confidence, usually at the cost of being more expensive to measure, while coarse-grained measurements will be cheaper but will have a more significant margin of error. With those measurements, we compute the difference, and if the result is zero, we have the same object based on that measurement. Thus, I would say it is "difficult" to know if two physical objects are the same if you want great confidence. Examples at the molecular level would be DNA and at color wavelengths. Thus, can we have something that allows us to certify a measurement that we can challenge against the physical object to check if the measurement is exactly what the object is claiming?
3 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

max ↑🎩 pfp
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
nothing is ever exactly the same definitely not at the molecular level but you can tell they are the same when zooming out
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Daniel Lombraña  pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
Totally true. We, as humans, agree on how we measure and compare things. For example, how much a meter has changed over the years: -1789 it was defined as one ten-millionth of the shortest distance from the North Pole to the equator passing through Paris, assuming an Earth flattening of 1/334 - 1875 is when the scientific world decided to use this measure as a standard - In 1960, a new definition based on a specific number of wavelengths of light from a specific transition in krypton-86 allowed the standard to be universally available by measurement - In 1983, this was updated to a length defined in terms of the speed of light - 2019 It is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the speed of light in vacuum c to be 299792458 when expressed in the unit m⋅s−1, where the second is defined in terms of the caesium frequency ΔνCs This is a clear example of going from coarse-grained solutions to fine ones so we can better replicate and compare things.
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions