Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
Alright I'm back, please roast my resume 🔥
12 replies
5 recasts
64 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
great start! would recommend being more specific about your contributions and quantifying their impact in order to take it to the next level. other feedback: - "built more frames experiments" reads as fluffy w/o any context, recommend adding in some context and any stats on growth or timeline - combining the dev and the community work feel off because the community work reads as hobby/interest section unless you include growth or retention or engagement stats - for the other roles + bullets, you do a great job of including the "what" but not the "so what?" behind what you did, i.e. did your work lead to increases in user retention, bids placed, notification reliability, etc.? - under Grove, would recommend axing "got a few paying users before pivoting" (too fluffy) and include X cusomters, $Y MRR before strategic pivot to XYZ - the format makes it read as if you work for farcaster vs. freelance dev / community builder - if there's lots of engineering references, recommend adding a link to your github
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
1. What if no significant stats but I still want to show that I built something? Not worth including in that case? 2. What if number of customers and MRR are negligible? (I updated to "a dozen paid users" in my latest version) 3. How would you recommend phrasing the Farcaster contributions? I said "Ecosystem Builder" and grouped it because it's all FC-related Didn't include GitHub because I'm not looking for eng roles + don't have much public stuff on there anyway. Good call on the community stuff, will try to add some relevant stats there. Thanks for the detailed feedback!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
