Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
pretty cool that the election has spurred my /all-in groupchat to talk more about blockchain — first w/ @polymarket and now w/ voting: "can someone steelman why voting should not be done via blockchain?" the answers are switching costs, implementation, security, etc. someone said privacy to which zk was the reply.
10 replies
0 recast
32 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
We’ll likely get there eventually but the law is very slow —especially in comparison to tech.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
yes agree but very motivating and encouraging to see non-crypto people seriously consider our technology instead of calling it a scam (!!)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Absolutely!! If they can get past just the financial aspects and into the tech, they start to get it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
SQX
@sqx
Some areas it just makes sense. This is one for sure. As an outsider as recently as ‘21 crypto does the worst job of pointing out these good uses though. Ticket stubs is another. They already went digital. Now go blockchain. What are the other obvious ? Court documents. Deeds. Diplomas. Easily verifiable register.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
