Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/airstack
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Danica Swanson pfp
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
Moxiesplaining Journal Day 28: Channels + Fan Tokens = Moxie utility I’m excited about the changes on the way for channels. Especially the option to use Fan Tokens for channel membership. Why? - Gives channels a built-in economic model to reward the time, labor, and attention of *all* contributors (founders, moderators, curators, active member-owners, and read-only followers who hold channel FTs) without requiring: 1) paywalls for content, or 2) monthly subscription fees. - More utility for FTs + good channels = increased demand for FTs and better long-term sustainability for Moxie. - Owners can choose how many tokens to require for membership, and can decrease that amount as desired to adjust for price increases (i.e., make the channel more economically accessible). - Easier spam filtering. Even skeptics may come around once they see this model in action. ---- (Moxiesplaining Journal is a daily window into my observations, learnings, and the view of Moxie from where I sit as a writer + editor).
5 replies
1 recast
12 reactions

TaylorWebb.eth pfp
TaylorWebb.eth
@taylorwebb.eth
completely agree with all of it! and thanks for the shoutout 💜
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Danica Swanson pfp
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
NP! This is how the FC scenius works at its best. :) I’ll probably write more about the possibility of using this model to reward *all* contributors including read-only FT holders, because it aligns nicely with the vision @tombeck.eth wrote about in his piece on the curator economy. https://paragraph.xyz/@driftless/curator-economy
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions