Update: 
Starting marketcap on @zora is now $22 (~60x lower)

This includes:
+ Improving liquidity across the market
+ More expensive to snipe large amounts
+ More posts getting more volume (not just viral ones)

We'll keep working getting this as low and liquid as possible.

Here's a way to think about this:  

Zora is creating markets to discover the true value of content. 

Most pieces of content are worth non-zero but not thousands of dollars.  

So actually we need to get this as low as possible over time for efficient markets.

Eventually, could the value of content be determined by both collectors that value the work (markets), as well as metrics like how many seconds the content was viewed, shared, etc? Similar to how the ticktok algo tunes itself, but instead of tuning the algo it's calculating value?

They may be very correlated, but it feels like content ranked by markets might eventually miss a lot of content that people would "value" in a different sense.