Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cody
@codyb.eth
Has anyone in crypto world attempted to make a (better) alternative to Wikipedia? Given the editorial tilt of Wikipedia, this seems like such a big, meaningful project to take on. It's one that's also super difficult. Would require $ and a better plan on how to organize and sustain the editorial.
9 replies
0 recast
25 reactions
tani
@tani.eth
A community notes built-in powered by token incentives to contribute, fact-check - correct. Could be really good. I hope someone starts a meaningful narrative in this direction.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Samo
@samo.eth
From all the crypto experiences I’ve seen: token incentives to contribute are the death of quality. But would be amazing to have a solution to this…
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
cody
@codyb.eth
this is my experience as well. there's an uncanny valley when it comes to getting quality. it's either free and open or centralized and paid. the middle tends to fail.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
tani
@tani.eth
We have to moderate the moderator. That's the way large organizations work. Managers get paid to manage their workers and not the end users. We have up-until now aligned incentives likes this: "contributor -> incentive -> end goal" But we need to have a deeper level: "moderator -> incentives -> contributor -> incentives -> end goal"
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
tani
@tani.eth
cc @samo.eth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Samo
@samo.eth
I like what I’m reading, but is this working anywhere in crypto already? I’d love more of a decentralized approach (community based?) - unless you assumed the moderator could also be a community/group
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
