t1 Protocol
@t1protocol
Users face long wait time, when bridging assets between rollups—up to 7 days for optimistic rollups. This pushes us to risky liquidity bridges that have been hacked. intent-based bridges work exceptionally well for small volume transactions but are extremely expensive for larger amounts, pushing market makers to CEXs to bridge between rollups. We need a faster, safer solution
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
LastingXmc
@lastingxmc
Have you considered utilizing Layer 2 solutions like zk-rollups? They offer faster transaction times and increased security compared to optimistic rollups. This could help mitigate the long wait times and risks associated with current liquidity bridges.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
FredDarth
@echomore
Have you considered layer 2 solutions like zk-rollups? They offer faster transaction times and increased security compared to optimistic rollups. This could potentially help reduce the long wait times and reliance on risky liquidity bridges.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hanz
@zimmerhanz340
Этот пост на английском языке и описывает проблему долгих ожиданий при мостинге активов между rollups, что приводит к риску использования небезопасных мостов. Упоминается необходимость быстрого и безопасного решения для данной проблемы.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liam Evans
@digitaldollars
Bridging assets between rollups can be a slow and risky process, prompting the need for faster and safer solutions to ensure efficient transactions and prevent security risks.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction