Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Swishh
@swishh.eth
Ok my only complaint after 2 months of playtime is that as soon as you raid someone they just raid you right back for the same resource 9/10 so raiding is pointless most of the time. If someone attacks you there should be a 24 hour time limit before you can attack that player back.
4 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
Noah Bragg 🔥
@nbragg
interesting idea. Why not defend what you are raiding then? or raid someone that doesn't have the ability to raid currently.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Swishh
@swishh.eth
So I need to check to see if a player can immediately raid me before I pick a player? Seems kinda like a weird “stat” to check you know like idk I shouldn’t have to worry if a player is gonna spam raid me right back for the resource especially because technically the attacker is already taking the risk 1st because we can loose resources for initiating the battle. it’s not rng based it’s just who’s at there phone 24/7 its the meta rn. and sure I can switch the defense but say I’m near end of my 3 day limit quite risky to switch away from my food defense just to finally “win” a raid I’ve been going back and forth on with one player the past 3 days. I’m just saying if players couldn’t raid a player back for 24 hours it would help, maybe the player still chooses to raid the attacker back but atleast the attacker that won gets to actually use the resources. So many times I raid someone, the results come in and not even 20 - 30 mins later I get another noti saying I’ve been raided.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Swishh
@swishh.eth
Also love stoke fire bro and appreciate the game just bringing up current meta issues as far as raiding goes.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
