Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

gami.eth āŽˆ pfp
gami.eth āŽˆ
@gami.eth
Very reasonable reasons to fork: āŒā—Ø Not convinced DUNA as described, and at expected cost, provides reasonable ROI to Nouns āŒā—Ø-ā—Ø Not convinced KYC requirement on grantees won't also be required of Nouns at a later date āŒā—Ø-ā—Ø-ā—Ø Not convinced a single proposal cycle is a reasonable amount of time for Nouners, guilds, sub DAOs and delegates to seek their own legal advice, let alone make a well informed voting decision (especially without said legal advice being funded collectively by Nouners as foundation's is and was) What are your /nouns-duna concerns?
3 replies
3 recasts
10 reactions

Swishh šŸ¦‡šŸ”Š pfp
Swishh šŸ¦‡šŸ”Š
@swishh.eth
Preach bro preach šŸ‘Œ
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction