Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
Something that concerns me about the fc signer architecture is how it increases the attack surface area for your account the more apps you allow to sign on your behalf This limits the propensity for users to try new apps especially if they have a large audience Solutions: portable signers? Permissions? Sessions?
14 replies
7 recasts
55 reactions
jon
@sweetleaf.eth
would love to see more granular controls for signers. not all signers are the same time-locked transactions would be good for some, introduce a delay where someone can cancel a potentially malicious tx permissions are 100% necessary imo a delegate contract that you can manage signers through
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
889 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction