Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Filipe | surfas0x
@surfas0x.eth
Curious to have your thoughts on this: is consumer crypto... 1) Consumer-like applications (e-commerce, social media, SaaS, etc) with onchain implementations, targeted at crypto native audiences. 2) Or applications for mass consumption, with a few crypto enabled functionality, sometimes even under the hood?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
I think both First one is just limiting from the beginning and therefore, given the culture, biased more towards degen and casino stuff more In my sense it's a lot more about the second, apps that even people from 1 will be happy to use and others would switch from web2 alternatives over, but they may not be even aware it's blockchains on the other end
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Filipe | surfas0x
@surfas0x.eth
That makes sense. But is it really possible to make that balance? An app that's appealing both to degens and general consumers alike? What would that look like?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
All degen pay bills right and use fiat just about daily - so that means they'll be especially willing to use apps that have crypto to fiat onramps while the rest of the folks will be depositing fiat into it and may not touch crypto stuff at all but use it in the same way Now the audience you're targeting can be different, if your idea is to do something on Arbitrum then I don't think that can be named consumer crypto app, only a crypto degen app Easiest example is perhaps, a polymarket, if they'd abstract crypto, I think it could go really far
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction