just a @super dog | 0xecCE45A52a55A3D331c490AD7AD1A597E8e7b52e

just a reminder, while the cabal keeps up with these psyops...

@superanon is a centralized version of @33bits, difference is that early adopters actually engaged and contributed value.

a groupchat decided to interfere with @superanon after it had already blown up, and called clanker to issue a false token.

anyone telling you anoncast "just happened" or that it "mentions superanon once" IS LYING TO YOU.
it will always be a vampire attack on the active anon community, especially considering the other official tokens.

don't take this anon's word, look at their content. look at the chart. they didn't do the actual work, and there's no grassroots narrative. it's just a technical demo and some podcasts.

there's a simple question that explains a lot of projects.

if there wasn't a nice-looking community in an interesting scene, would any token have been issued at all?

33bits first cast is over a year ago, but the account owner never issued & pinned a 33bits memecoin until a month ago.

because they saw the other successful memecoin. because there was upfront, baked-in value from account activity. upfront, nonrenewable attention for speculative premium. upfront VB buy-in to copytrade.

the market is the final judge. did it collectively see more value in a real, active community & reach escape velocity? 
no. both charts are regressing back to fundamentals. even the official clanker token is crabbing. that's the objective reality.