Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sumaa pfp
Sumaa
@sumaa
@bountybot 25 usdc to the first person that provides a correct answer to this defi trivia I want to see if this is known among the defi community or not
9 replies
1 recast
5 reactions
Bounty Bot pfp
Bounty Bot
@bountybot
@3fcc was paid 25 USDC for this bounty
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Bounty Bot pfp
Bounty Bot
@bountybot
@3fcc you have received an onchain attestation via EAS for this bounty completion
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bounty Bot pfp
Bounty Bot
@bountybot
Confirmed! On your bounty page, you can pay users and view their bounty completion history Frame buttons - Admin: manage bounty status, amount, deadline, add boost to get more attention on your bounty ๐Ÿค– commands - @bountybot cancel - @bountybot in progress - @bountybot complete (optional: tag winners) - @bountybot shoutout (optional: tag winner and write a positive review)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
๐—”๐•“๐•“๐—ฎ๐•ซ โ†‘๐ŸŽฉโ†‘ pfp
๐—”๐•“๐•“๐—ฎ๐•ซ โ†‘๐ŸŽฉโ†‘
@3fcc
To my understanding, perpetuals enable higher leverage because of efficient funding rate mechanism, no fixed repayment schedule, quick automated liquidations, e.tc. Undercollateralized lending protocols offer lower leverage because they deal with actual asset loans. The positions are often longer-term and liquidation process is slower. Higher safety margins are needed to protect lenders.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
gatedude.eth pfp
gatedude.eth
@gatedude
Could you patient while I write a Thread on this? I have experience with both perpetual Trading and Undercollaterized lending. Gimme a sec while I give you a full explanation.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Hamza pfp
Hamza
@canhamzacode
Perpetual gives you more leverage because you are only speculating on the price of an asset, not borrowing or lending the actual asset. The company can easily liquidate your position if the market moves against you, hereby minimizing their risk. In contrast, undercollateralised lending involves borrowing real asset which exposes the lender to more risk. To protect themselves, they require more collateral and offer less leverage just to reduce their chance of loss.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gatedude.eth pfp
gatedude.eth
@gatedude
Hey, the reason I lost this is cause yesterday while I was trying to post the thread on X, only some part of the thread posted; without the videos. So, yeah I re-wrote the thread without using videos. I hope you have a nice read! https://x.com/0xgdude/status/1836098181681066061?t=0FcJzMDLVdAyFi-pRl9VtA&s=19
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gatedude.eth pfp
gatedude.eth
@gatedude
I think I lost this one, but I've already written the Thread lol. I'II as well post it haha even tho I don't win the BOUNTY
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Winnie pfp
Winnie
@winni3
Because perpetual contracts manage risk more efficiently which enables greater leverage, let me explain; You can access more leverage with perpetuals because they use real-time liquidation engines, allowing for fast position closure if prices move against you. This quick liquidation process reduces the risk for exchanges, enabling them to offer higher leverage (up to 100x or more). In contrast, undercollateralized lending protocols like Gearbox rely on slower, on-chain liquidation processes and off-chain oracles, which introduce delays. These delays increase the risk of bad debt, leading to more conservative leverage limits. Perpetuals also typically require only a small margin to maintain positions, while lending protocols demand higher collateralization ratios.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction