Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Suffuze pfp
Suffuze
@suffuze.eth
Do we feel like protocols will ever be brave and utilize proof-of-humanity solutions to distribute airdrops and just take the heat from the bots? Seems like they get fudded by the sybil-operated bots anyways.. I know Linea has been using some PoH protocols, but considering the numbers I'm not so confident it's even preventing sybils still lol. Maybe they just aren't mature enough or we just need to go back to ICOs? 😅 I kind of like the idea of everyone having access to the cheap seed prices instead but having a sybil filter + address limit. WDYT?
3 replies
1 recast
6 reactions

MOΞ pfp
MOΞ
@moe
There is no such thing as proof of humanity. All those projects are just memes that don’t actually solve anything. Besides. It’s not human vs bots. It’s good content vs spam. Or real users vs farmers. Crypto projects that focus on proving their users are human are focusing on the wrong thing.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Wasiq pfp
Wasiq
@wasciv
I think protocols will eventually adopt proof-of-humanity solutions for airdrops, though it’s a tough battle against bots. Linea’s efforts show the potential, but the challenges with sybil attacks remain. PoH systems might need more maturity, and combining them with a sybil filter and address limits could be a step forward. Returning to ICOs isn’t ideal. A balanced approach could ensure fairness and accessibility. Your idea of seed prices with proper filters sounds promising.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Zach 🔵🎩🔮 pfp
Zach 🔵🎩🔮
@zach-gafford
I'm all in favor of trying to reduce sybil farming. Using protocols should be rewarded, but when you're farming it so extractively, like some do, it can be very damaging to the protocol early in its life cycle. Distro to well intended users is most important.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction