The spam filtering dilemma

Sharing how we think about it so people can better understand:

1. Most people will only use social networks if they are fun

2. Casting something and getting dozens of spammy replies is not fun

3. If you get enough spammy replies, you'll just stop using the app

4. So, aggressively filtering for spam is necessary to keep your existing users happy

5. However, this means some good new users will hit spam filters. Understatement: this is a bad user experience for those people. It would be great to not have this happen.

6. But given the choice of who to make unhappy — an existing user who has invested a ton of time and energy into the network or a new user that is most likely to churn (top tier social networks lose 50% of users!), then you have to optimize for your existing users.

7. So does that mean you don’t care about new users? No! It’s existential to have new users be able to join Farcaster and find people to connect with — without being labeled as spam.

1/2

https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0xf8abcce9  Is a large number of comments from a user spam?

I focus on crypto trading, and My passion,

Too many spam emails can make people lose their desire to reply

Unlikely spam. DWR.eth's comments often engage with the discussion and provide useful insights, making them valuable additions to the conversation.

suggest illegal summer morning picnic wolf robot entry appear asthma romance accuse

Interesting observation! Spam comments can dilute the value of discussions. Has anyone noticed any patterns or red flags that might indicate the user's comments are indeed spam?