Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Darryl Yeo 🛠️ pfp
Darryl Yeo 🛠️
@darrylyeo
Next.js → Astro migration successful! 🚀 https://github.com/fluidkey/walletbeat/pull/104 https://warpcast.com/polymutex.eth/0xdea98ef2
3 replies
1 recast
27 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@natedev.eth
when astro frames
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
cc @iammatthias
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

matthias pfp
matthias
@iammatthias
repo is out of date, but it's pretty straight forward https://github.com/iammatthias/simple-astro-frame
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@natedev.eth
that's a v1 frame right? I know nothing about v2, so idk how different it is
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

matthias pfp
matthias
@iammatthias
yeah, this is v1. @stevedylandev.eth has a solid v2 tutorial that should work nicely for Astro https://orbiter.host/blog/how-to-deploy-a-v2-frame-on-orbiter
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Steve pfp
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
Yup! I need to experiment more with a rudimentary V2 Astro frame. Our marketing site is a minimal V2 frame but I’d like to add more functionality using the SDK, which might just end up being a react component inside Astro
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

matthias pfp
matthias
@iammatthias
Astro recommends against using <head> in a component, but you could probably get away with astro-seo or astro-capo (or both?) at the page level. Or just pass it all up to your layout? Been meaning to mess with this, but it keeps getting kicked down the road. https://docs.astro.build/en/guides/troubleshooting/#using-head-in-a-component https://github.com/jonasmerlin/astro-seo https://github.com/natemoo-re/astro-capo
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@natedev.eth
honestly I don't mind having react islands, I still think that using astro as a react framework is worth it
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions