Farcaster

Looking for honest feedback—no need to sugarcoat.

What's one thing that would make the Farcaster protocol better for you?

building /hatsprotocol | 
proudly mid-curving it since 1995

in the same vein as what @spengrah.eth is saying: being able to force inclusion of messages directly on-chain is an important feature for censorship resistance. would be analogous to being able to force inclusion of a transaction on L2 via an L1 inbox in case the sequencer goes down or starts censoring transactions

I'm not too familiar with the way messages are broadcasted and gossiped by hubs today, but I would imagine they can be modified not to process (i.e. store or at least relay) certain messages

Even if censorship resistance isn't a factor, bringing that functionality on-chain enables a lot of interesting applications

I like this idea long term, but what about Hubs today is not censorship resistant?