Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
Hate to say it, I think people like the idea of multiple clients on Farcaster vs the reality of everyone using a master client. There are still some great legos for building auxiliary tools like Frames, Cast Actions, or building the graph into your app to help jump start it. But in the end, I think Warpcast will remain the default client, just like Bluesky has a default client. Protocols like Mastadon that the dream of a multi client network doesn't seem to really build the network. You might be posting to Farcaster, but you're probably doing it through Warpcast 😗
14 replies
3 recasts
35 reactions
Haole
@haole
that's good actually. the protocol need attract more people first, then other clients will have opportunities
2 replies
1 recast
25 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
Do you think users have a need to try other clients outside of warpcast? Imo unless you’re onboarding your own users you’re not going to benefit much from warpcast growing the protocol
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Haole
@haole
As a general client, it's hard to complete with warpcast without new novel features. If warpcast user base is growing, there will be more people trying other clients. e.g. Many Japanese users love to use Recaster, the UI is more suitable for them.
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions