Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I root for the Warpcast team. But I would appreciate an updated explanation why @xmtp is not our default IM/GC protocol (with all the nice things a deep integration with Farcaster could add). Honest question, and I know very little about the XMTP design, so the answer may be very simple and I'm just missing it.
3 replies
3 recasts
19 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
On the other hand, I could also ask why xmtp does not provide better integration with Farcaster. For example a way to use XMTP with my Farcaster custody wallet (can I?). Or populate my contacts and filter conversations using my Farcaster social graph.
3 replies
1 recast
6 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
xmtp is the protocol and they have many clients so it's not as simple as xmtp implementing all these features you can create an xmtp account with your farcaster custody wallet, however a more interesting integration would be if the protocol let you create xmtp signers using farcaster signers (eddsa) instead of just an ethereum wallet
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
This is what I meant. Some changes at the protocol level to support FC integration. And then, it's up to the clients.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
If we could use xmtp with sign-in with farcaster, and automatically get our profile and address book populated, and spam filtering using my Farcaster social graph, it would be cool. A real "opportunity for a client".
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
