HIGHER

IMO the path higher is going down is too passive. Too much of just sitting back and saying “hey you can come build on top of h”. 

Higher needs to turn the switch and become aggressive in seeking talent and PAYING for it. I don’t know exactly what the best flow for this is… could be focusing on some listings.. could be focusing on finding accounts on X who have influence. Could be trying to onboard some well known builders to higher… prolly all these need to happen and fast.

shaping the ideas that shape us /native /believein 🇵🇸

I would encourage becoming more outsider friendly in 2 ways. 

1) A lot of the interaction & telling of the Higher story is enigmatic and hard to grasp for someone not in the inner circle. I know that's perceived as a feature & not a bug. You don't need to totally get rid of that, but there needs to be clearer communication of what Higher is immediately accessible as someone gets introduced/interested. 

2) HIgher people as a community need to be more engaging w/ outsiders. It's a hard group to crack. If you ask questions, engage, & encourage & your aren't clearly part of the inner crowd it's a hard to feel welcome. Encouraging people to more outsider focused friendliness & giving some specific help or tools should help with that. 

I'm speaking from experience & watching others on both points. I'm a prime candidate to onboard. I'm pretty normal and friendly and tend to focus on encouraging others here and it's been a hard group to crack into. Just being honest so it helps. Appreciate Higher 💜 👊 🫡

Talking about the passivity is important and appreciate hearing you and others talk about. I appreciate your example in the comment too. 

I'll give you another example that has nothing to do with paying from my answer to jihad about onboarding people in 2025. I didn't use the term passivity in my answer, but you'll see the idea.

Buildoor in the web3 space. Fully trained to shill any crypto on my podcast TheNextBlock.

Going higher in /higher channel

Talking about the passivity is important and appreciate hearing you and others talk about. I appreciate your example in the comment too. 

I'll give you another example that has nothing to do with paying from my answer to jihad about onboarding people in 2025. I didn't use the term passivity in my answer, but you'll see the idea. 

https://warpcast.com/bradq/0x70509ece

On a web3 journey. Guiding friends & allies on adventures in the new world |

Nouncil | web3 storytelling | iambradq on Twitter | FC OG

brad knows. (i mean. look at teh box!) agree with the statements.

fwiw. 🍖 has an even numbers go up issue. and IMO they ARE doing everything right. 

space is tricky. very tricky.

Lil curious about blockchain
PD @artistprogram
AF : Market Discussion (All markets).

An interesting note there with ham. I think ham has a much more friendly, open community that welcomes outsiders better. 

But ham has the same issue as higher with telling its story well for outsiders. The outsider sees ham as too complex and niche cultic. 

But this is a higher discussion....so that's for another time 😀

I think higher athletics is a good direction. but as with gnars. it requires patrons and recipients who NEED to spend the coins. 

agree that I dont think /higher has had much crossover from FC. for various reasons. but probably also agree mostly because its all philosophical.