Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Dara Khan
@spookyaction-btc
Oh, you wanted weekend Nounish data? Yeah, we've got that. Generally speaking, all of the Nounish DAOs are decently well-capitalized currently relative to their forward-looking revenue estimates and prop spend. We looked through the past year of prop spend for each DAO. Prop spend has been less than 10% relative to current treasury and forward-looking revenue. Nouns DAO is, of course, the exception.
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions
Dara Khan
@spookyaction-btc
The Nounish DAOs are more niche in their purpose and efforts (e.g. Park for music, Purple for Farcaster, EduNouns for education, etc.). So it makes sense to us that they would have fewer proposals requesting smaller portions of the treasury as a % of funds. These proposals tend to focus on irl activations, often co-hosted with Nouns or other Nounish DAOs as well as for Nounish efforts driven directly from the treasury.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dara Khan
@spookyaction-btc
We also wonder if there is room for more frequent proposals/ideas for use of treasury funds from the Nounish DAOs, with potential room for collaboration. Certainly, that has happened especially at many of the irl events that have multiple Nouns DAOs attending. We wonder if Nounish DAOs have the opportunity to use treasury funds for smaller proposals or to contribute to Nouns prop funding where there is overlap in goals.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction