Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Spencer Perkins pfp
Spencer Perkins
@spencerperkins.eth
The recent NounSwap treasury swap props have revived the discussion around permissionless swapping (thanks @frog).

 Curious what the sentiment is around a simple swap contract with a fixed fee going to the treasury? This is similar to what we proposed in NounSwap’s original failed proposal, but based on community feedback, and potentially a shift in sentiment from $nouns wanted to re-engage to see if this is something the DAO would be interested in. The benefit is a new revenue stream for the DAO, and preventing wasting attention and gas of having treasury swap offers going through governance.
3 replies
1 recast
8 reactions

Spencer Perkins pfp
Spencer Perkins
@spencerperkins.eth
Links below for more context @frog reviving this dicussion: https://warpcast.com/frog/0xa85565bc Recent swap proposals: * https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/571 * https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/566 * https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/541 Original NounSwap proposals: * https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/457 * https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/nounswap-auction-house-a2b6590a6dc916fe317dcab169a18a5b87a5c3d5
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

Spencer Perkins pfp
Spencer Perkins
@spencerperkins.eth
Farcaster discussions (that I could find, a bit hard to navigate threads): * https://warpcast.com/noun40/0x8975e1e8 * https://warpcast.com/toadyhawk.eth/0xe01cb237 * https://warpcast.com/el4d/0xc02a9a79 * https://warpcast.com/coleperkins/0x3be1177c
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction