six pfp
six
@six
I was thinking, you don't really need blockchains for composability/interoperability, you just need open APIs permissionless composability, blockchains do provide but if there were theoretically some non-blockchain tech that just exposed open data, and the end-result product that takes advantage of this data is the same, then the blockchain part would not be necessary for the end product
14 replies
7 recasts
35 reactions

abram pfp
abram
@abram
it costs money to provide that data, which makes it hard to be truly "open"...and then there's the issue of APIs being updated/changing making maintenance hard/time consuming...both i feel like an open consensus mechanism actually is needed?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

six pfp
six
@six
yeah i guess i moreso meant, the capabilities of a resulting product that uses that data, would technically be the same in theory. i still think blockchains are necessary for the reason you describe, but the end user experience on a product would theoretically not be different
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction