Farcaster

"programmable social" feels more compelling than "decentralized social"

- steam room thought today

https://zora.co/collect/base:0xa8d7b172108a65676918183e3ab27bd992948022/3?referrer=0x44b1b486Ce8d9C82f605626347a7B1F74ADD11DE

netizen @archetype; ex-@coinbase; /aapi

katiechiou.xyz 

yea fair, why I specified maybe not the specific word programmable. Maybe “composable social” or something

agree with the sentiment/points made, but i think "programmable" semantically isolates builders/devs and "normie" users which is a already a big criticism of crypto at-large

listened to @ted's MSC pod today and got me thinking about what a good channel specific client could look like. So I made a concept for /nba 

The goal was to think about what an nba fan would want in an app, then add social elements from fc (vs thinking about building a fc client w/ feed)

would you use this?

this take resonates, and feels a lot more end user centric. I had a similar thought today as I was wireframing a concept for a channel client

this take resonates, and feels a lot more end user centric. I had a similar thought today as I was wireframing a concept for a channel client

https://warpcast.com/vmathur/0x71fd05ad

completely agree. we were coming to similar conclusions about orgs as well… programmable orgs > decentralized orgs when you think about the value prop to the end user / participant

Businesses care about decentralization more than the consumers. Decentralizing business models is going to be the truest innovation of onchain social.