This is why we need Chain Abstraction... 
How do you explain this to the newbies? It’s the same asset, but not really the same.
Terrible UX!

Luckily, we're already working on fixing this at @reown 🫡

Toolkits to build onchain UX → /reown. Builders of the WalletConnect Network. For the WalletConnect Network, please visit @walletconnect

it used to be worse select chain -> select token, so it's getting better :)

I like how 1inch is visualising 👇🏻

but still the next step of fixing cross-chain payments: I want to send 10 usdc, and use 5 from base, and 5 from optimism e.g.:

Web Team Lead & Research Team Lead @reown

Founder @payflow /payflow payflow.me /crimea 🇺🇦

Yah, I do it already on @payflow using @paywithglide, works exactly this way: you choose what to send / mint / buy farcaster storage / subscription etc. and you're provided with token options to pay with!

But still you can't aggregate and pay from multiple tokens/chains.

Step by step…
The goal is for the user to say “I want to send USDC” and the wallet figures out where to pull it from, bridge if necessary, and complete the request however it thinks is best.
Ultimately, user choosing a chain directly should be discouraged or left as an advanced use case.