Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Quick access to frames in casts could be powerful: @dwr.eth -> user /dwr -> channel $eth -> assets +frame -> frame? Other related idea is while $ works for tokens, there's not a great generic contract address standard. Frames paired to contract addresses as a default UI could be interesting.
28 replies
15 recasts
143 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
How is the +frame resolved? Is there a registration process similar to channels?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If we did it we likely would do it onchain. Donβt want more Warpcast only tech debt. :)
1 reply
0 recast
13 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
πππ love to hear a shift away warpcast-only tech debt <3 another option is a reverse-lookup friendly-name render, but need to worry about collisions/impersonations/scams ie. providing a frame permalink renders as +displayname
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Steve
@sdv.eth
What if the existing fname namespace was used but as subdomains? So +uniswap.swap is swap.uniswap.farcaster.eth under the hood That way it's not a scramble to maintain yet another new namespace
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
I like this! ENS supports different records, so could have a `frame` record on shazow.eth so +shazow.eth resolves to a frame whereas @shazow.eth resolves to an account. (Then I could also have +foo.shazow.eth or whatever.) Then ideally the *.farcaster.eth would resolve to the same kinds of records.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions