3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
I don't think the trinary you're proposing here is absolute.
People can want different regulation that doesn't really fall into any category.
Like.. I live in California where we have some serious environmental issues: Crazy fires, failing ground and surface water issues, disgusting air pollution, obscene lack of accessible housing, etc.
Some problems require more, less or better regulation. Some need public services or a public buying option, or better infrastructure, different dis/incentives, etc.. Many things just need more money because the biggest businesses here pay few taxes and push the burden onto working people.
Sometimes these things conflict w/ each other, making problems more complex. Capitalism creates precarious conditions which require onerous regulation to maintain, in an ever-deepening spiral of negative externalities.
The interests of capital and the state are *intended* to be at odds under capitalism, and the idea that it's a "people problem" is fraction imposed by the ruling class. 1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction