frames

Not every frame needs to be growth hacked behind a recast and like to view. This reeks of subscribe to view article pop up dark patterns.

If the frame is good enough, people will want to recast and like it on their own accord.

father, husband, css golfer, ux engineer, silently defining variables as /sdv sdv.wtf

is there a more efficient way to track these? do frames support click trackers?

What do you mean by track these?

Frames are web servers; they can track every incoming button press. However, not impressions like views because the client (like Warpcast) can/should cache the initial image and thus it doesn’t hit the web server.

Ah, I think I get what you’re getting at. 

It would be easy for clients like Warpcast to track button presses and other engagement, but that should be weighed carefully in algorithms since there’s some frames with submenus that would artificially drive up numbers.

rankings seem to be based on # of recast which doesn’t necessarily reflect total # of user engagements, need 1x1 or click tracker equivalent — there’s a disconnect between a user’s ability to assess a frame’s engagement on warp which perpetuates cast farming to climb  in rank