Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Saxophone🎩🍖 pfp
Saxophone🎩🍖
@saxophone55.eth
GM powermonday🫠 Today, I tried to add analysis for PB, but I failed. I wrote the code, but the results are useless. I scored engagement using OPENRANK scores. However, official PB holders bots have high scores for their automated responses, resulting in some people scoring higher than Dan 🫠 I need to figure out how the PB algorithm avoids these official bots 😭 If you have any ideas, please let me know secretly!😘 Goodbye 5 hours of my life🤣
3 replies
2 recasts
6 reactions

Fibo / Scryptoguy pfp
Fibo / Scryptoguy
@scryptoguy
I haven't looked at the data so this is just a random thought. I think we don't need to score engagement using OR, because OR itself is what scores engagement. If we want to go further than OR(to be exact, engagement rank), we may want to see how metrics other than engagement correlate with acquisition of the badge. Automated response or not doesn't affect a power badge acquisition probably.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Saxophone🎩🍖 pfp
Saxophone🎩🍖
@saxophone55.eth
Yeah! I have only compared the number of engagements, so I decided to focus on "who liked it." I am convinced that a like from me and a like from Dan are not of the same value. So, I thought of using the already calculated OPENRANK scores. I never imagined that official bots would have ranks many times higher than mine🫠 As you said, I believe that no matter how many auto-replies us get, we can't obtain a PB. (If we could, all PB holders would be spam bots by now🤣🤣) However, since OPENRANK treats them equally, this approach was a failure.🤔
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction