Scott pfp

Scott

@scotthconner

94 Following
67 Followers


Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
This is based lmao. I questioned why he went through the trouble, but here we are.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
We Do. Feel free to tag me on any discussions.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Been watching Base meme culture. It's definitely nascent. But starting to see meme coins like #BasedStreetBets crossing with Far aster and Frames takes a page out of the book of $DEGEN. Something special cookin here.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
If Farcaster hub operators run them at a loss because there's no emissions, is the hub operator argument one of a business-enabling loss leader? Is it a Solana validator type argument?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Does the farcaster hub system have any economic incentives to be run, or run correctly? What are the data availability guarantees?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Lmao what
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
If you're dreading work today, you have the wrong job.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
If you squint, a 4337 wallet isn't much different than a CEX. No dapp integration, centralized point of failure, trust assumptions, and someone else paying your gas (but maybe charging you something else).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
If EOAs don't have to pay gas, it solves a lot of the problems of doing one-off signature schemes. Still, something like EIP 3074 I feel like is the right direction. Onboarding friction aside, having solid use cases that folks are willing to overcome friction for, and scalability, are far more important t IMO.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Definitely not questioning protocol priorities. ERC 4337 is explicitly outside the protocol. The 4337 mission seems to be onboarding. 4337 may enable easier use, but it's the strong use cases themselves that will bring in users, who will overcome friction relative to the use case value.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Why? Imagine if we had put the effort into enshrinement instead of all this temporary, centralizing infra? We could be done.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Im still not convinced the step back is worth the trade off. Everyone agrees it's temporary until enshrined AA so it seems like a lot of throwaway work.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Paymasters for EOAs I feel like would give us 80% of the power. All of the bullet points on the slides could be describing a 4337 relayer. What am I missing?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Dis troof rite here mai gai
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Permissionless kickoff with Eric just put all of us on a list! ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ™๐ŸคŒ๐Ÿš€ Radical as always. Love it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
If you or anyone else is interested check me.out on bird app
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Yeah it had some eth and USDC in it. Since it's a smart contract wallet, the EOA I signed with had nothing but a soulbound Locksmith key. So it couldn't steal that. Funds are safe "elsewhere"
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Missed this. How'd ya do? Challenges were great this time
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Permissionless today, Istanbul in November!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scotthconner
Local Austin cryptonite here!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction