Just as predicted, VC & special interest groups undermining the community. This proposal was centered on the deployment of Uniswap on BNB, not a behind the scenes lobbying battle about which bridge to use. Pretty egregious behavior. Take note https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/31 https://i.imgur.com/TzgOcfI.png

Partner @ Anagram | Ex-Binance Labs, OG @ConsenSys | Research MetricsDAO

Building, advising, investing 

I'm confused, were there only three voters?

If so, isn't it two wolves and a lamb deciding what's for dinner?

If a16z owns a majority of your governance tokens, then the protocol is working as designed I guess.

I always got the sense that the Uni token 1) didn't accrue value and 2) didn't truly have functional govt.

They're delegates, there are others participating