Kevin McGillivray pfp
Kevin McGillivray
@schmevin
Oh guess what, I’m thinking about generative art and pattern languages - here comes whatever threads are called here:
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Kevin McGillivray pfp
Kevin McGillivray
@schmevin
An important detail of Christopher Alexander’s work describing pattern languages is that _instances_ of a pattern are always unique, adapted to both the conceptual/structural context of the pattern and the immediate, tactile reality where it emerges
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Kevin McGillivray pfp
Kevin McGillivray
@schmevin
So while it has the common characteristics of the pattern, as a _center_ of wholeness/life it is entirely unique. His favorite example was leaves on a tree, but of course this applies to main entrances to buildings etc
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Kevin McGillivray pfp
Kevin McGillivray
@schmevin
His early work emphasized the underlying structure of the pattern. His later work emphasized the immediacy of the _center_. How do I help _this_ center to become more alive? The pattern is a helpful direction to that end
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Kevin McGillivray pfp
Kevin McGillivray
@schmevin
His fundamental question was how to arrive at a creative process of unfolding for making buildings that moved like nature — to encode a generative pattern that retains and strengthens wholeness and emergent adaptation to personality and context
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Kevin McGillivray pfp
Kevin McGillivray
@schmevin
His theory was there are infinite processes, but not all of them are capable of creating life. We can study natural processes of transformation to find approaches to try.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions