if fc doesn’t want to put together a year-in-review here, then base should step in

they can support vaporware & shitcoins for “volume” & continue their  nonsensical listings or they can get behind day 1 base builders, who are not only proven executors but are value-aligned 

they need to breakdown clanker & post an official report from the coinbase x account

it should really be on the official COIN IR website under “base,” which should have its own section at this point given the ecosystem growth 

they can get behind anon, veil, native, bnkr, and clankermon to start 

these are proven teams doing both extremely important & also novel & entertaining work that needs to be highlighted given the distribution challenges of fc

i don’t know how telling this story is not the #1 priority for both fc & base 

sure base has the agent narrative, but fc…? 

this is some of the most positive work of the cycle

“fc” should be synonymous with “clanker,” “frames,” and “ecosystem flywheel” rn

think that there is truth in basil's larger feedback here 

Base has done a great job supporting increasing volume on stuff like cb wrapped assets on aerodrome 

bootstrapped ecosystem, founders who are all friends and legitimately having fun, building apps on a social graph with live coins 

no one from coinbase has reached out to ask "proxy, are you taking the steps necessary to achieve a coinbase listing in the future?" 

jesse has been super supportive, and we are taking steps necessary for many things to happen, but why isn't this a priority? the market wants it, I could use the knowledge to support people in the eco growing their marketshare, and base would win by fostering an authentic culture much more likely to bring over attention & users from solana than (sorry) brett would ever, or has ever this year

think farcaster has probably been more helpful behind the scenes than people realize, but I do wish that there was a bit more awareness of how much a clankermon scale project can do

time to go hard

Excuse me, sir, did you recently modify the clanker contracts? Apparently, the most recent ones aren’t supported by the trading feature. Was there a change in the ABI? 🙏

User Support @clanker

Proof ▶️ https://warpcast.com/proxystudio.eth/0xf40780f3

Based 🟠 discoverbase.xyz $SPECU on Base by @clanker KEEP CLANKING This is the way !

🙏 I created a tool that supports v1 and v2 for transfer via the ABI, but apparently, v3 gets stuck, specifically during the trade. I’m using the Coinbase CDP and the native tool that I modified to pass addresses directly. It works with all tokens except for v3 Clanker so far. I’m still looking for the solution 😅

We’ve upgraded 3 times

@qliqk please find out what’s needed here to fix sango’s issues