Velocity in action and decision making is highly valued these days (Agile methodology, Zuckerberg’s motto “move fast and break things”, etc.).

Yet what struck me the most working with a former boss and mentor of mine was how he kept postponing dealing with potential issues in a non-procrastinating way. He would often say things Iike “let’s wait and see”, “we’ll cross that bridge when we get there”, etc.

Now that I’m in his shoes / his role, I’ve come to appreciate the value of Falkland’s law: unless you *must* make a decision, don’t make one. Prioritize patience and information gathering over making unnecessary decisions.

Not only does it keep your options open for later, it also avoids you having to change your mind and confuse people with new directions.

But more notably, I’ve often noticed that problems I was anticipating just… vanished before they could even materialize. The environment, priorities, resources available, constraints, etc had changed enough in the meantime.

There is value in Longcutting

“Let time be the magic ingredient” - how often, no - how many times - have premature decisions been made disguised as attempts at shortcuts. 

Take the long cut.

https://herbertlui.net/longcutting/ 

https://warpcast.com/aviationdoctor.eth/0x4b5469cb

customer support @supercast

trying to sound smart /doingnumbers

creating and destroying; built flying cars & autonomous vehicles, now building /faust, more here: /july, web: july.rocks

@woj.eth said this a bit a go with waiting for AI to be good enough to take a shot at a problem again

Certainly feels like it with code and others

Had a PDF reading problem. AI today not good enough without high effort.

6 months into the future? I assume that PDF task will be automated with it