Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
Talking to people with communities if the new channel model becomes way less frictionless in managing members and using mini apps to have a home that’s fully customizable (e.g. webapp) as companion then now you have - social community platform with feed - dm chat system + groupchat - custom home (mini app) that’s easily reachable from channel (community platform) That’s powerful Add frames, cast actions and bots + the fact that the content and social graph won’t be rugged The above is what people care about, the complaining is about friction. As we march on and remove friction we‘re good
5 replies
4 recasts
32 reactions

Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
Great insight Samuel!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
Would love to get your stream of thought on all these legos interleaving
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
Imo, this fits strongly into my thinking of vertical integrations. Every app inherits a social space. “Arriving” to it like you do a coffee shop, mall, bar, corner, etc. Hear the chatter, jump in if you want, jump out if you need, and continue or stay. You can have private meetings or public ones. 1:1 or group chats. I think those that don’t allow their users to have their own “public square” even if it’s for 10 people, will lose out. Always open to your thoughts too!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions