Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Sam
@sams
Let's revive $nouns! We want to leverage $nouns to bring our @esports audience onchain while maintaining long term economic alignment with Nouns ⌐◨-◨ https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/scaling-nouns-with-%24nouns-68a2ad5b63ab374fc5f6f7d1fb5f41b267035868
7 replies
13 recasts
40 reactions
mike good ⌐◨-◨
@mikegood
I think I’m pretty against this. $nouns was created by verbs… voted down by the DAO. Deployed by a “fan”and is now being made out to be some official coin (more so than nogs) when it’s actually not.. the coin also let people kinds soft fork their nouns. Feels like we’ve lost votes since $nouns not gained any new long term participants. Feels like adding another way to arb the DAO (maybe I’m wrong about that but who knows) and avoid going to auction which is going to hurt nouns big long term. And further, drop quorem..? I think that’s a mistake, especially if it’s not dynamic based on how many are in the pool.. didn’t wiz propose or float this months ago? Could work now with the esports spin. We’ll give you guys anything you want. GG
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sam
@sams
1. It’s technically an “official” token because it’s backed 1 to 1. 2. $nouns hasn’t gained any traction because we haven’t supported it. 3. The drop in quorum is just to reflect the Nouns that aren’t votable, I agree it’s not a good long term solution but it works in the interim imo
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Sam
@sams
Also we don’t need this and I don’t actually expect it to pass. There’s a part of me that wants this prop to fail because I know the alternative is much easier on the development side, but I also really want to build nouns.gg out in a way that is economically aligned with Nouns.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
