Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
FIP: Reduce Storage Limits @wazzymandias.eth's proposal is up for review. it reduces the # of casts, links and reactions per storage unit to help hubs scale. https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/189
46 replies
15 recasts
479 reactions

LazyFrank🦉 pfp
LazyFrank🦉
@lazyfrank
When we hit storage limits, doesn’t it just start deleting our old actions / casts? Nothing needs to stay around forever imho. I’m fine with reactions from 3-6 months ago disappearing. Let them burn!
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

Samo pfp
Samo
@samo.eth
But it doesn't affect the algo, not knowing what to (not) feed you - when it's lacking info about your previous reactions?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

LazyFrank🦉 pfp
LazyFrank🦉
@lazyfrank
If I'm reading that correctly you're saying by losing those past reactions the algo won't know how to properly feed me what I want? Hmm interesting point, although I do enjoy blowing away my youtube history every so often to "start" a new so idk how good/bad it'd be for my feed on here.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Samo pfp
Samo
@samo.eth
It's ok when you do it, your call - but feels different when others decide it for you. Sure, you have the choice of buying more storage, but I don't see this working for huge scaling...
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

LazyFrank🦉 pfp
LazyFrank🦉
@lazyfrank
Oh I don’t necessarily agree with their proposed changes especially lowering existing users amounts. It’s always unfun when you pay for something then it’s changed later so you have less.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Samo pfp
Samo
@samo.eth
100% that's why, imo, the change shouldn't be retroactive
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

LazyFrank🦉 pfp
LazyFrank🦉
@lazyfrank
Completely agree, especially not until next billing cycle / whatever we bought so far is at current rate and new stuff is new #’s
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction