🧵1/5 The #SushiSwap controversy highlights the intricate challenges of DAO governance, spotlighting the need for frameworks like #QProtocol’s (q.org)Governance as a Service for clarity and enforceability in decision-making. 🌐 #DeFi

🧵1/5 The #SushiSwap controversy highlights the intricate challenges of DAO governance, spotlighting the need for frameworks like #QProtocol’s (q.org)Governance as a Service for clarity and enforceability in decision-making. 🌐 #DeFi  https://shorturl.at/itPY2

Web3 enthusiast. Passionate about DAOs, Web3 Governance, and DeFi. 
Opinions are my own.

2/5 #QProtocol could have provided #SushiSwap an opt-in for treasury oversight, offering external checks against misallocation of funds, and ensuring decisions align with guidelines set by the community, as per the DAO Constitution. 🛡️

3/5 Under #QProtocol, Root Nodes can oversee Integrated Application funds, vetting decisions made by expert panels. This could have provided #SushiSwap a safeguard against misallocation, ensuring funds are used as per the community’s constitution. 📜 #Governance

4/5 The Root Nodes’ ability to veto decisions ensures #SushiSwap’s treasury actions remain within constitutional bounds, protecting against overspending or misuse and maintaining the project’s integrity and trust. ⚖️ #DeFiGovernance

5/5 The #SushiSwap saga underscores the need for DAOs to adopt reliable governance frameworks like #QProtocol. It’s time for a governance revolution to rebuild trust within the #DeFi community. The future is now. 🛠️ q.org