Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Solidmage pfp
Solidmage
@solidmage
I want to know what people think about removing Phaver point system from upcoming seasons. Do you agree or disagree with it and why?
12 replies
0 recast
67 reactions

Russell pfp
Russell
@russellmc
It wasn't looking good for SOCIAL under the previous point system, I'm glad the team are taking the community feedback & making adjustments to incentivise the token through a different staking model. It's a refining process (trial & error) to get the correct system. The points will still have a place in the future once we establish growth. I'm looking forward to the Solana integration + more liquidity on DEX, it also means SwissBorg can list the token.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Pika123 pfp
Pika123
@pika123
Does it mean Swissborg only support SPL tokens?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

CryptoGrogu pfp
CryptoGrogu
@cryptogrogu
Good summary! I think, incentives are an important part of Phaver. For some users this is not relevant, the just enjoy the community spirit. But especially for attracting creators, incentives are important. And Phaver can only grow with valuable content which again attracts users. And if users are incentivized for (good) interactions this raises attractiveness again. If there measurement for content creation and interaction are Phaver points or something else can be debated. The planned social staking approach is definitely a step into the right direction, or at least an exciting experiment to try it. As you said, try and error helps to improve. The one who stops trying has already failed.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction