frames

Controversial opinion but when frames time out or fail to load follow up images but the backend state transitions it makes for a HORRIBLE experience. Should there be some kind of feedback or something for the developers who post the frames? I feel like it really kills the whole promise 50% of frames actually work

I'm eth newbie..just learning
(working on @farcaster)

terminally.online

Cold starts I will give as a legit problem but they should be very very rare, especially on viral frames. Per the feedback, I am of the position that without some kind of punishment for the frame there won't be any change. I hate that position because I want to believe in people but its consistently bad in my exp

Agree, we’re thinking about how to put more feedback in the validator and track actual performance metrics.

Two big problems:
 1) Not enough performance feedback
2) Cold starts. Many otherwise well designed frames are prone to this.

The problem is that there isn't an effective feedback cycle. The frame @ https://degen-stats.vercel.app/ works like 25% of the time. Should the frame still even render in the feed? IDK it feels like there should be some kind of reward for people who actually can handle the traffic and have functional frames.

Building /stokefire a mobile strategy game onchain. Run and own poolfish.xyz a calculator for LP providers. Built Potion solo and sold for $300k.

Yeah agreed. It just times out. Should let the dev show an error message or farcaster should show a different error state.