Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rocketman
@rocketman
The current revenue model of the internet reduces our vibrant subcultures to 1-dimensional infinite content feeds, forcing culture's creators to compete against each other for attention. And while the worlds attention has centralized around a few platforms, there's been a rise in cultural attachment as a primary selling point given the near unlimited optionality in products and services. Thus creators are sponsored to push their fans to consume products and services from companies that are only interested in profit. Creators command a huge amount of attention in the world, but their cultural influence is co-opted by corporations for soulless ends.
2 replies
4 recasts
15 reactions
rocketman
@rocketman
The millions of artists, athletes, and creators building subcultures all around the world are unable to come together in a positive sum way around the value they're creating. Most struggle to make money, and the ones that do sell out their fans via sponsorships. Unlike a company, all participants in the creator economy are operating in single player mode. Outside of setting up a shared bank account and legal structure that requires a large amount of trust, groups of creators do not have the means to economically rally behind their subcultures and collectively command the economic energy they generate. Instead, for profit brands reap the majority of benefits and creators are left to compete in the infinite-feed arena.
2 replies
1 recast
6 reactions
Cool Beans 🌞
@coolbeans1r.eth
Viva la revolucion
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions