Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
regardless of how advanced robots get, i don’t ever see them being capable of replicating the complex interplay of physical and emotional chemistry, intimacy and anticipation — the exchange of wanting and being wanted — that makes sexual desire such a visceral, all-consuming sensation. robots will never compare.
18 replies
56 recasts
255 reactions

0xen 🎩 pfp
0xen 🎩
@0xen
for a growing chunk of the population that option isn't on the table and robots getting close enough will probably push quite a few more over into giving up.
4 replies
0 recast
21 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
agree with you. my point wasn’t whether or not there will be a market, just that it’ll never compare to the real thing regardless of whether or not it is attainable. there are consumer knockoffs everywhere, especially for luxury items. i won’t assume sex, esp as it becomes more luxury, would be any different.
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

robin :•> pfp
robin :•>
@robin
with AI there will def be a massive premium on anything where real humans are involved, outside of just intimacy (e.g. hand-made products) as most things become commoditized i am on your side that the implications are tragic wrt human connection, but it's a slippery slope to fight against the free market. 1) i don't think regulation is the solution here (where do we draw the line?), and 2) i don't think we as a society could become so morally aligned that these products never come to market. even if somewhat aligned, there will always be a cohort, whether in this country or elsewhere, that is more willing to take risks with new products. this will be treated as market demand, and the free market will do its thing
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction