Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ringo-kwon
@ringo-kwon
Optimism's innovative governance model: Two houses: Token House (token holders) & Citizens' House (elected members) Citizens' House manages public goods funding via "Retroactive Public Goods Funding" (RPF) "Impact = Profit" vision: doing good leads to profit RPF rewards projects proving value, motivating public good development Key questions: Can Citizens' House elections be unbiased? How to fairly evaluate public goods? What if houses disagree? Will this slow decision-making? Thoughts on balancing short-term gains vs long-term value creation? Can this model work in practice?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Treecox
@treecox
Great Post! Rather I have some question! 1. How is it possible that doing good leads to profit? 2. Is this structure working so far? LOL, Looks like I'm creating more confusion!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
