Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

wylin💎↑ pfp
wylin💎↑
@wylin
“real-world public goods nouns is more interesting than crypto infrastructure (& media production) nouns”
5 replies
1 recast
18 reactions

Rickyday .⌐◨-◨ pfp
Rickyday .⌐◨-◨
@rickyday
Imo Nouns is doing great with their production/product/public goods, but the lack of marketing investment for the same productions/product/public good is our main problem, because its spreads only for us in the community and not much for outsiders to bring more people.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

wylin💎↑ pfp
wylin💎↑
@wylin
we’ve spent many hundreds of eth on marketing, guess it’s a matter of how it’s been deployed
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Rickyday .⌐◨-◨ pfp
Rickyday .⌐◨-◨
@rickyday
I Agree, not saying about funding props, but after delivered the prop itself (a documentary as example), has a lack of marketing investment from proposers to get views, buyers, selling, stuff like that, not that nouns didnt funded mkt props, this is what we invested more. Just, that after the product is done, doesn't has a continue lifetime.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rickyday .⌐◨-◨ pfp
Rickyday .⌐◨-◨
@rickyday
Not saying about all props, of course, there was some awesome props funded that didnt had much impact for lack of self investment after delivered.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wylin💎↑ pfp
wylin💎↑
@wylin
i think we’re saying the same thing in different ways. the marketing spend hasn’t always translated to pickup where other proposals needed help, which imo is what the marketing spend should be for
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction