Content
@
https://uniswap.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam
@rhynotic
My @uniswap v4 hook (btcacc.com) is currently ranked #4 in TVL and #3 in volume, but I don't really think it makes sense spending time/energy creating more projects with v4 hooks until Uniswap has better support for them. - NO ONE routes through the pools. Uniswap's API / Frontend doesn't even route through pools with custom hooks that aren't allowlisted, same with 0x / Relay. Insane that they'd spend years creating this and not have support for small projects day 1, stifling any experimentation. - They should pay whatever the cost (or engineering resources) is to get Dexscreener / Dextools / other charting sites to integrate (or better yet, chart themselves) I have a lot of onchain game ideas I want to make with hooks, but creating them just to get no volume due to the issues above makes me hesitant. That being said, getting $500k volume and $250k TVL even with the above issues makes me think I'm creating in the right direction.
8 replies
3 recasts
13 reactions
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
Ah mad this had this as a passing concern but appreciate you laying it out Feels like main value prop right now is for new launching new tokens with a hook on the main LP anything else feels like an uphill battle Congrats on the success
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam
@rhynotic
Which i mean if your product is compelling enough, people will go to the site to trade but it's just an extreme uphill battle like you said. I'm sure they'll be fixed eventually but pretty insane to me at this point how difficult it has been
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
