Ethereum

I'm trying to sum up the Solana vs Ethereum discussion. Can someone help?

Solana:
- Uses a consensus mechanism (PoH) that allows more throughput but requires better computers which is a centralising force (computers will improve tho)
- No need for bridging (the L1 already scales)

researching evolution & collective intelligence

https://joao-abrantes.com

Ethereum:
- Cheaper to set up a node (more decentralised)
- Can scale with L2s but requires bridging which is a bad UX (can this be fixed though?)

Ethereum's goal is to be the cheapest L1 to set up nodes and the easiest to build L2. This makes it technology agnostic when it comes to scaling.

I think if the UX problem can improve then a Solana-like L2 on eth would have the best of both worlds? High-throughput and cheap nodes.

What am I missing? Can the UX problem be fixed?

This is oversimplifying it but if you are envisioning an SVM L2 then the UX problem is solved or at least on par with other L1s the moment centralized exchanges integrate the chain

most likely liquidity and developer network effects given solana has had a head start as the only SVM chain ...remains to be seen what apps will actually port over to an SVM L2 or will we see entirely new apps or copy pasta of what exists on the SVM today probably a little of all these things

Yeah, so in that world what would be the best argument for Solana L1?