Pierre H. — q/dau pfp

Pierre H. — q/dau

@rektorship

197 Following
208 Followers
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
roc it or it didn't happen 🤘 https://roc.camera/ preordered mine, thanks santa @july.
4 replies
31 recasts
185 reactions
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
my biggest profit since the bull market started
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
not sure what's the publication name is (rektorship?) domain: https://unchained-onchain.xyz/ wallet address: 0xfA89ee073436cF2e4ef1Fd4130aFfD389E56f2a1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
hey @colin it seems like i can't sign with my wallet anymore (Unknown Error with metamask) + password recovery doesn't work.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
legend
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
man thank you so much for the good read you share. truly means a lot 💌
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
cli: https://github.com/openfort-xyz/openfort-7702-cli 7702 smart account proxy: https://github.com/openfort-xyz/openfort-contracts/blob/feat/eip-7702/contracts/core/upgradeable/UpgradeableOpenfortProxy7702.sol
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
spent the week diving into 7702/4337 compatibility. programming an eoa feels like witchcraft but once you see it in action, it just clicks. 1) craft and sign the authorization hash 2) send the 7702 tx to activate the delegation 3) send batch txs within a user op
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
i've wrote a cli to explore 7702/4337 and it's really fun: you can send userOp from your EOA. feels like magic. account now has two nonces: the transaction count of the EOA and the 4337 nonce stored in the entrypoint contract. wtf. 🤯 give it a try: https://github.com/openfort-xyz/openfort-7702-cli
0 reply
2 recasts
4 reactions
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
what's your opinion on space colonisation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
"We simultaneously know everything and nothing about how each program works"
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
didn't know you could mute words in the other app
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
crazy to think the earth harbours 20^18 ants ans they weigh more than all birds and mammals combined. fascinating species
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
If you're wondering what's happening in the crypto infra world, but can't be bothered to track the 2024 buzzwords, I recommend watching this talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5809YJpbhFg Key quote: “Maybe we should accept that networks at scale happen to have a large box in the middle.”
0 reply
2 recasts
10 reactions
Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
mint a @hypersub directly from a cast with @payflow did @sinaver.eth ask us for permission? no did he need to? no was special access or coordination required to make this happen? no permissionless interoperability ftw✨
2 replies
14 recasts
52 reactions
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
the xz backdoor is a perfect mix of technical prowess and social manipulation, with an unlimited potential scale. here is the best post i've read on the story: https://boehs.org/node/everything-i-know-about-the-xz-backdoor a rabbit hole well worth every second!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
beauty thanks 🤙
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
currently building one to surpercharge your EOA with openfort smart account capababilities (session keys, batching, recovery...) CLIs are so much fun :))
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Pierre H. — q/dau pfp
Pierre H. — q/dau
@rektorship
channels
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
I don’t understand why anyone would pit Polymarket’s U.S. election market against the likes of Nate Silver, or compare it with any election survey really. An election survey only asks “who do you want to see win the election” (aka who do you intend to vote for). It’s a question about one’s own personal preference. Polymarket asks “who do you expect will win the election”. It’s a question about guessing the collective preference. Add in the confounding practice of bet hedging, and Polymarket is not only a terrible survey instrument for measuring personal intentions, but arguably a questionable predictor of electoral outcomes, too. The only upside to this noise is that it brings a great crypto use case (prediction markets) into the spotlight, and by extension, drives onboarding
9 replies
16 recasts
84 reactions