Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Benjamin Basche pfp
Benjamin Basche
@basche42
Social savings groups are an extrmely fertile ground for emancipatory and solidariatic prefigurative political economies https://warpcast.com/basche42/0x0b4e1652
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
rathermercurial pfp
rathermercurial
@rathermercurial.eth
Sarafu Network is online for commitment pooling. ๐Ÿ‘
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’ pfp
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’
@degencummunist.eth
Can I has link plzzz๐Ÿ™
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
rathermercurial pfp
rathermercurial
@rathermercurial.eth
FWIW, I made an account with the handle rathermercurial@cryptoleft Maybe we can make an informal @cryptoleft squad?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’ pfp
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’
@degencummunist.eth
๐Ÿซก๐ŸคŒ Testing this kind of tool is legit my #1 priority. What do you think the difference is in user experience between this and doing a multisig on safe? Bc that was the first solution I thought of for whipping up these kind of pools. Easy and ready to go, agree on what the tokenized governance will be and have an informal arrangement for contributing to the fund
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rathermercurial pfp
rathermercurial
@rathermercurial.eth
I think they're for different use cases entirely. Though I'd guess/hope that they could be composed together. Sarafu is for a permissioned group of vouchers to be pooled at a set exchange rate, and exchanged freely with members or outsiders. Seems like it could be used for many things, like mutual aid, rotating community labor, retrocomp, commitment-backed currencies, simple trade, etc. People can be creative and flexible with it and use their vouchers as they like (even in multiple groups!). A multisig is better for controlling resources held mutually by a small team of collaborators, or by delegates of a larger community. It allows many people to use Ethereum as one account, but outsiders can't really interact with its resources much, besides some limited delegated spending authority.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’ pfp
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’
@degencummunist.eth
๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ Iโ€™m picturing what youโ€™re cooking up and liking how itโ€™s going down! Yea one feels fluid, active and easily/immediately permissible in a micro-loan/solidarity way. And the other is for big, foundational, passive yield/staking, and long term/democratic but macro and potentially massive at scale.๐ŸคŒ Absolutely complimentary to each other tho. One can be a mutual aid loan accounting for your in home business, the other is your mutual mortgage loan you used to buy and build up your home/business in the first place, so that you can give the same kind of mutual aid back!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rathermercurial pfp
rathermercurial
@rathermercurial.eth
Something like that.. Multisigs aren't great for big, democratic orgs without tooling layered on. But great for people, teams, councils, circles, etc. etc. Comittment pooling is more of a way to mutualize and trade resources between those entities while meeting people where they are, with whatever they have to offer.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’ pfp
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’
@degencummunist.eth
Oh yea, safe has a ton and will have more tools to offer for that imo
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction