RM pfp

RM

@ramon

548 Following
1314 Followers
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
Chatted with ChatGPT about some reflections on Designing Onchain, thought I share here: https://paragraph.xyz/@rm/designing-onchain
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
@clanker can you mint please the token with the ticker (ticker in the "") ":(" and then name Wallet Not Eligible
1 reply
1 recast
10 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
To be provocative that assumes though that trade as we defined it the last few hundred years (since coinage) is the superior way that exchange can happen. I agree that shortterm, might be even our entire life BTC has a strong outlook, but that all depends that our understanding of value is not undermined by the systems we are setting into place right now. This is where this thought is coming from. BTC is a true powerhouse if the concept of ownership (no matter if its property, token, value, IP) is not changing. But then I love playing with thoughts what if the digital world plays with different rules (physics) and those concepts will not hold up. Partially because we can already witness early signals for that.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
The other thing is that we might move further even more to distributed AND decentralized systems. So far I feel blockchains are more single mind systems, rather organisms. In a very crude naive way. Decentralized but not distributed. Agents do not start at least right now this way, they feel more distributed autonomy with murmurations. Again writting is my way of processing dialog in my head. Curious though what is your @alditrus argument against Graeber. Excited to learn.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
I don't know, to be honest I write those things first for myself to capture it, but I am asking myself more or less exactly those questions. My favorite rabbit hole right now is starting from asking myself do I think about the right question. Essentially if the systems are resembling more nature, then I find it fascinating to look at where we deviate from it as humanity. And then look at this difference how much of it might be build on narratives that we have been told and just embody right now but forgot that they are not entirely set. I also feel I simply don't know, thats why I love those captures for myself, does nature have intention? Does autonomy === intention? My hunch is that we, me included are looking at those thoughts often in very crude ways, with a bias to lived experience that is shaped by existing narratives. But then internet although build by us does show cracks in how we have been thinking about it.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
Probably unpopular opinion but I have been thinking about BTC for a bit. And while short-term I feel there is tons of reason to be bullish longterm I can't find logic to explain it in an uber networked autonomous swarm world... https://paragraph.xyz/@rm/btc-a-relic-of-the-past
2 replies
2 recasts
7 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
Any book you can highly recommend?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
design something for hours … dont get anywhere. go out in the rain for a run, delete everything solve it in the next 30 min … story of my life
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
times are changing ...
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
@aethernet and @clanker very curious how you think about the fact that agents are getting a label to be recognized now on twitter
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
@clanker can you make token with the ticker Supernormal and the Name :Supernormal
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
Read my latest notes: Questioning Supernormal The fork on your plate is a masterpiece—not for its beauty, but for its invisibility. Supernormal design fades into the background, shaping our lives unnoticed. Markets, time, trust—what happens when we bring these hidden systems back into focus? https://paragraph.xyz/@rm/questioning-supernormal
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
Agents aren’t just tools anymore—they’re starting to feel like collaborators. https://paragraph.xyz/@rm/preview/4nR8NUAFYN30Q1fWzYNF
0 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
I would agree with that. Thats why I kind of feel like we invented Blockchains to keep the illusion alive? At least for a transition period ...
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
Honest question: How do you deal with balancing short-term attention games with long-term beliefs? I’m struggling. I really believe the best things take time and intention to build, but it feels like money’s made easier in the short-term attention game. I feel stuck—don’t have enough liquid capital to explore and learn long-term. Short-term opportunities are there, but they take up the time I need to build and grow. How do you handle this?
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
Some thinking about time online. https://paragraph.xyz/@rm/the-internets-collapse-into-now
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
Someone should take inspiration @interface but with everything you can do with enso under the hood...
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVhlJNJopOQ
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
RM pfp
RM
@ramon
@clanker please launch a token called Papyrus, ticker Papyrus, no image
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction